CACC & CACPB
working together for our neighborhoods
The next meeting of the College Area Community Council and College Area Community Planning Board is Wednesday, September 9, at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Room of the College-Rolando Library at 6600 Montezuma Road. Map this location.
- Agenda (PDF)
General membership of the Community Council is open to College Area property owners and residents, representatives of businesses and non-profit agencies operating within the College Area (CACC Bylaws).
Current College Area Community Plan (at the City of San Diego website).
Trustees’ plan to leave infrastructure costs to City taxpayers is shot down
Tuesday, 04 August 2015
The City of San Diego and residents of the College Area received some good news yesterday, when the California Supreme Court ruled that SDSU has to pay its fair share of the cost for street improvements to mitigate the increased traffic and congestion that resulted from its decision to expand from 25,000 to 35,000 full time equivalent students back in 2007. Although it’s not clear what the immediate impact of this decision will be, the long term result will be more money for street improvements in the College Area. Below is the press release from the San Diego City Attorney’s Office (PDF):
The California Supreme Court today ruled that the California State University Board of Trustees violated state environmental laws by expanding the campus of San Diego State University without including funds for infrastructure improvements that are needed to prevent congestion on San Diego streets.
City Attorney Jan Goldsmith declared the decision an important victory for San Diego taxpayers, who were on the hook for several millions in street improvements that the project’s environmental impact report said were necessary to mitigate project impacts. The City had previously won this case before an appellate court, but the CSU Board appealed. Deputy City Attorney Christine M. Leone argued the case before the Supreme Court in May.
City of San Diego v Board of Trustees of the California State University (copy attached) was closely watched throughout the state, and especially by other college cities – including Bakersfield, Fresno, Long Beach, Monterey Bay and San Francisco – where the CSU system was similarly trying to stick cities with the bill for street projects identified as necessary mitigation in the projects’ environmental impact reports.
The EIR for the San Diego State University expansion identified 15 intersections, eight street segments, four freeway segments and one freeway ramp meter that would be significantly impacted by the project. It calculated the project’s “fair-share contribution” of the needed improvements at $15 million, but took no responsibility for those costs, effectively leaving them with the City and Caltrans.
The CSU Board of Trustees contended it did not have to pay for the mitigation projects because the Legislature had not allocated funds specifically for that purpose. San Diego argued that the California Environmental Quality Act includes no such exemption, and noted that numerous potential funding sources already exist and are identified in the project’s budget.
The Supreme Court ordered the Board to vacate its certification of the EIR and to proceed with a new document that will discuss all potential funding sources and provide a compelling argument if any of them cannot be used for project mitigation.
“This is an important decision which treats the CSU system like any other developer. It must come to the table and negotiate its fair share in a way that protects the environment and protects the city’s taxpayers,” Goldsmith said. “I am proud that our City Attorney’s Office took the lead on this important legal issue, which has great significance in cities throughout our state.”
In an amicus brief, the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties asserted that if the CSU Board’s position was upheld it would “undermine the missions of cities and counties, which provide critical local public services – a patently unfair result.”
Read the Court's decision (PDF).
Committee Annual Reports
- CENRP 2014-15 Annual Report (PDF)
- CACC Beautification Committee 2014-15 Annual Report (PDF)
- Community Outreach Committee 2014-15 Annual Report (PDF)
- Project Review Committee 2014-15 Annual Report (PDF)
- Treasurer's Annual Report FY 2014-2015 (PDF)
See more committee documents:
Project Review Subcommittee Report to the CACC/CACPB, 12 November 2014:
Capstone Development Partners LLC presented revised plans for a 94 unit apartment building/374 bed dormitory proposed to be built at 5030 College Avenue. The meeting was held at their request in advance of an official resubmittal to City Planning Department. The resubmittal is expected to occur within the next calendar month.
The meeting was advisory only; no vote or action was requested of the Project Review Subcommittee.
Six members of the sub-committee were in attendance. Capstone had about seven or eight staff and consultants in attendance. About 30 or 40 community members were also in attendance.